Free Essays on Saddams Final Warning

Saddam’s Final Warning Any American with any type of television programming, whether it be the most advanced Satellite system, or the most basic local stations can turn on the news and see that Saddam Hussein poses a clear and present danger to the United States. Today November 11, 2002 is Veterans Day and instead of giving a speech on past wars President Bush gave Saddam Hussein his final warning. The President made it very clear that if Saddam does not comply with United Nations armistice laws by Friday November 15,2002 that the United States of America will lead a coalition of nations against Iraq forcing the armistice upon them. Saddam Hussein has been linked to the brutal murders of his own family members who did not agree with him. If a man can kill his own bloodline then what is stopping him from murdering millions of innocent civilians that he has never even met? To answer this question honestly, nothing is stopping him, he just has not made his move yet. If the rest of the world sits back and allows him to make the first move millions of innocent civilian lives will be lost. The men enlisted into the armed forces know from the start that they may die in battle one day. This does not make it okay to send them to battle and not worry about them because they always knew it might happen., the United States must fear for their troops as well as have faith in them. Guaranteed any soldier would rather die in battle than they would live to see another terrorist attack such as 9-11-02. Osama Bin Laden did not have the funding, resources, or the power over his country that Hussein does. Bin Laden killed over 3,000 innocent civilians by simply flying a few planes into buildings. With the technology and resources that Saddam owns he could murder millions of Americans by dropping a nuclear weapon on a large city such as New York, or Los Angeles. Unless America wants to bury millions and rebuild entire cities, a... Free Essays on Saddams Final Warning Free Essays on Saddams Final Warning Saddam’s Final Warning Any American with any type of television programming, whether it be the most advanced Satellite system, or the most basic local stations can turn on the news and see that Saddam Hussein poses a clear and present danger to the United States. Today November 11, 2002 is Veterans Day and instead of giving a speech on past wars President Bush gave Saddam Hussein his final warning. The President made it very clear that if Saddam does not comply with United Nations armistice laws by Friday November 15,2002 that the United States of America will lead a coalition of nations against Iraq forcing the armistice upon them. Saddam Hussein has been linked to the brutal murders of his own family members who did not agree with him. If a man can kill his own bloodline then what is stopping him from murdering millions of innocent civilians that he has never even met? To answer this question honestly, nothing is stopping him, he just has not made his move yet. If the rest of the world sits back and allows him to make the first move millions of innocent civilian lives will be lost. The men enlisted into the armed forces know from the start that they may die in battle one day. This does not make it okay to send them to battle and not worry about them because they always knew it might happen., the United States must fear for their troops as well as have faith in them. Guaranteed any soldier would rather die in battle than they would live to see another terrorist attack such as 9-11-02. Osama Bin Laden did not have the funding, resources, or the power over his country that Hussein does. Bin Laden killed over 3,000 innocent civilians by simply flying a few planes into buildings. With the technology and resources that Saddam owns he could murder millions of Americans by dropping a nuclear weapon on a large city such as New York, or Los Angeles. Unless America wants to bury millions and rebuild entire cities, a...

The Winning Formula for Writing Success

The Winning Formula for Writing Success The Winning Formula for Writing Success The Winning Formula for Writing Success By Mark Nichol When I wrote the heading for today’s post, I thought to myself, â€Å"I should be making infomercials and workshop presentations, offering my ‘secret’ for a thousand dollars.† A thousand dollars a head for even a few dozen participants? That’s what I call successful writing: With one phrase and a few platitudes, I could take a couple of years off from work. Nah. I’ll give it to you free of charge: Quality requires quantity. Yes? And? That’s it. Quality requires quantity. Oh, all right. I’ll expound. That’s a layered statement, one that’s as deep as you want to dive. But on its most basic level, it means that an output of high quality must be preceded by an input of high quantity. In other words, a return of quality takes an investment of quantity. The new publishing model is that, thanks to the Internet, everyone’s a writer. That’s the good news. But it’s also the bad news, because it means that because many writers in this suddenly expanded universe are not highly qualified, the universe is degraded. There have always been less-than-stellar writers, but it was more difficult for them to publish their work and sustain success. Now, however, nonprofessional writers can be forgiven for believing that because it’s easy to type, it’s easy to write. And the remaining exemplars of great writing are lost in the leveling of the signal-to-noise ratio if they are sought out at all anymore. The brave new world of formal publishing is also degraded, in this case by a business model that no longer values quality because remember, quality requires quantity (and quantity, of course, requires financial investment). So now, I can find six typographical errors stuffed into a twenty-word caption in the website for a major metropolitan newspaper (since corrected because, hey, it’s the instant Internet, and we can always fix it later!), and I can find my enjoyment of a newly published book compromised by shoddy editing (improvement of which must wait for the second edition, if there is one, and if there is the wherewithal to improve it but that’s too late for me). That’s why I may come across as a dinosaur about these things, because I believe that if something is worth doing, it is worth doing well. And because I believe that, that’s why I’m proud to remain part of the old-school old guard, editing book manuscripts for publishers willing to spend time, effort, and especially money to ensure that their products reflect their high standards. Quality requires quantity. Oh, quality is sometimes accidentally produced with a minimum of quantity, but standards cannot rely on serendipity. The work ethic is called that for a reason: Good isn’t easy. It takes effort. Quality requires quantity. There’s at least one other layer to the formula. Last week, I wrote a post about another formula, what I call a writing-competence matrix. Rather than explain it here, I invite you to read the post, if you haven’t already, or to review it, if you have. Go ahead. I’ll wait. What does it take to score high on this matrix? Don’t expect to ever hit â€Å"Expert† on all three counts; many successful writers may excel in only one category. But to rate highly in even one area takes time. Remember the 10,000-Hour Rule? (That’s all right. I’ll still be here when you get back.) If you want to be a great writer, be content at first with endeavoring to be a good writer. Great can wait. But to become a good writer, you must invest quantity in your quest for quality quantity of time and effort. And you must be willing to labor not only longitudinally, putting in years of skill development, but also latitudinally, massaging, refining, and polishing each piece of writing along the way. Remember this truism: If it’s easy, you’re probably not doing it right. Quality requires quantity. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Writing Basics category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:75 Synonyms for â€Å"Angry†Do you "orient" yourself, or "orientate" yourself?Is "Number" Singular or Plural?